Authentik vs Authelia comparison. Two leading self-hosted SSO solutions. Features, protocols, ease of use, and which is best for your homelab or business.
Authentik offers more features with a management UI and LDAP support. Authelia is simpler and lighter, ideal for basic SSO behind a reverse proxy with 2FA.
| Feature | Authentik | Authelia |
|---|---|---|
| Web Management UI | ✓ | Config only |
| SAML 2.0 | ✓ | ✗ |
| OAuth2 / OIDC | ✓ | ✓ |
| LDAP | ✓ | ✗ |
| RADIUS | ✓ | ✗ |
| Two-Factor Auth | ✓ | ✓ |
| WebAuthn/FIDO2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Duo Push | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reverse Proxy Integration | Via auth middleware | Via headers |
| Resource Usage | Higher (4 containers) | Lower (1 container) |
Winner: Authentik — Authentik wins for most use cases with its management UI, broader protocol support (SAML, LDAP, OIDC), and user self-service features. Authelia is the better choice if you just need simple 2FA SSO behind a reverse proxy.
Authelia for basic SSO. Authentik requires more containers but the UI makes ongoing management easier after initial setup.
Yes. Both integrate with Traefik. Authelia uses forwardAuth middleware. Authentik uses its outpost system.
Authentik, due to SAML and LDAP support. Most enterprise apps need SAML. Authelia works well with apps that support OIDC or header-based auth.
Not really. SSO is most valuable with 5+ users. For personal use, a reverse proxy with basic auth or Tailscale might be simpler.