Docmost vs Wiki.js comparison. Notion-like collaborative editor vs Git-backed multi-engine wiki. Features, self-hosting, and which wiki wins for your team.
Docmost wins for teams wanting a Notion-like editing experience with real-time collaboration. Wiki.js wins for teams that need Git-backed content, multiple storage backends, and enterprise-grade authentication.
| Feature | Docmost | Wiki.js |
|---|---|---|
| Editor Type | WYSIWYG (Notion-like) | WYSIWYG + Markdown |
| Real-time Collaboration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Git Integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Storage Backends | PostgreSQL | Git, DB, Local, S3 |
| Authentication | Local + OIDC | Local, OAuth, SAML, LDAP, OIDC |
| Page Hierarchy | Nested spaces + pages | Tree structure |
| Search | Full-text | Full-text + search engines |
| Docker Deployment | ✓ | ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Draw Diagrams | Built-in draw.io | Via Mermaid |
Winner: Docmost — For most teams in 2026, Docmost is the better choice. Its Notion-like editor with real-time collaboration lowers the adoption barrier. Wiki.js is the right pick only if you need Git-backed content storage or enterprise SAML/LDAP authentication.
Yes. Docmost has a very similar block-based editor with real-time collaboration. It is the closest self-hosted alternative to Notion for teams that want wiki-style knowledge management.
Yes. Wiki.js can use Git as a storage backend, meaning all your wiki content lives in a Git repo with full version history, branching, and pull request workflows.
Docmost. One Docker Compose file with three services (app, PostgreSQL, Redis). Wiki.js requires more configuration, especially if you want Git or SAML integration.