Gitea vs GitHub comparison. Self-hosted lightweight Git service vs cloud platform. Features, pricing, CI/CD, and which is better for your project.
Gitea is the best self-hosted Git service: lightweight, fast, and free. GitHub offers more features (Actions, Packages, marketplace) but at a cost and with less privacy.
| Feature | Gitea | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Git Hosting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pull Requests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Issue Tracker | ✓ | ✓ |
| CI/CD Pipeline | Via Gitea Actions | GitHub Actions |
| Package Registry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wiki | ✓ | ✓ |
| Private Repos (Free) | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Code Review | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAM Usage | ~100MB | N/A (cloud) |
| API | REST + Swagger | REST + GraphQL |
Winner: Gitea — For self-hosting and code privacy, Gitea wins. It runs on minimal hardware, supports Actions CI/CD, and gives you full control. GitHub is better if you need the social/community aspects or massive integration ecosystem.
Yes. Gitea has a built-in GitHub migration tool that imports repos, issues, labels, milestones, and pull requests.
Gitea has its own Actions system that is compatible with GitHub Actions YAML syntax. Most workflows can be migrated with minimal changes.
Yes. Gitea is used in production by many organizations. It handles thousands of repositories reliably with minimal resources.
Yes. Gitea supports organizations, teams, permissions, and code review. It works well for small to medium teams.