Mattermost vs Rocket.Chat comparison. Enterprise-focused Slack alternative vs MIT-licensed full-featured chat. Compliance, omnichannel, pricing, and which to self-host.
Mattermost excels at enterprise compliance with HIPAA and FedRAMP certifications. Rocket.Chat offers more features at a lower price with MIT licensing and omnichannel support. Both are excellent Slack alternatives.
| Feature | Mattermost | Rocket.Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Slack Import | Built-in | Via migration tool |
| Video Calls | Built-in | Built-in |
| Omnichannel Support | ✗ | ✓ |
| License | AGPL+BSL | MIT |
| Compliance | HIPAA/FedRAMP | Limited |
| RBAC | ✓ | ✓ |
| LDAP/SSO | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile Apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Docker Deployment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing | $10/user/mo | $4/user/mo |
Winner: tie — Mattermost wins for regulated industries needing HIPAA/FedRAMP compliance. Rocket.Chat wins for teams wanting the most features at the lowest price with MIT licensing. Both are excellent Slack alternatives.
Both replicate the Slack experience well. Mattermost has built-in Slack import. Rocket.Chat supports Slack-compatible webhooks and integrations.
Mattermost. It has HIPAA compliance and can be configured for FedRAMP. Rocket.Chat does not have these certifications.
Rocket.Chat. Its enterprise plan is $4/user/mo vs Mattermost's $10/user/mo. Both free self-hosted versions are feature-rich enough for small teams.