MinIO vs Ceph comparison. Simple high-performance object storage vs distributed storage platform. S3 compatibility, performance, and which to choose.
MinIO is the best choice for most self-hosters — simple, fast, and S3-compatible in a single container. Ceph is only needed for large-scale distributed storage clusters.
| Feature | MinIO | Ceph |
|---|---|---|
| S3 API Compatible | ✓ | ✓ |
| Setup Complexity | Single container | Cluster required |
| Distributed Storage | Erasure coding | CRUSH algorithm |
| Block Storage | ✗ | ✓ |
| File System (CephFS) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web Console | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bucket Notifications | ✓ | ✓ |
| Object Locking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Minimum Nodes | 1 | 3+ |
| Performance | Very fast | Good at scale |
Winner: MinIO — For self-hosting, MinIO wins by a mile. One container, S3-compatible, fast, and easy. Ceph is enterprise infrastructure — only consider it if you're building a petabyte-scale distributed storage cluster.
Yes. MinIO implements the S3 API and works with AWS SDKs, rclone, mc (MinIO Client), and any S3-compatible tool.
Only when you need petabyte-scale distributed storage across multiple nodes, or when you need block storage (RBD) or a distributed filesystem (CephFS).
Yes. MinIO supports erasure coding across multiple drives for data redundancy. A 4-drive setup can lose 2 drives without data loss.
For basic file storage, consider Garage (lightweight S3-compatible) or just use your filesystem with NFS/SMB.