OpenProject vs Plane head-to-head comparison. Features, pricing, self-hosting difficulty, Agile support, and which project management tool wins for your team.
OpenProject wins for enterprises needing Gantt charts, time tracking, and BIM support. Plane wins for modern teams wanting a fast, clean interface inspired by Linear and Jira.
| Feature | OpenProject | Plane |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | ✓ |
| Docker Deploy | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gantt Charts | ✓ | ✗ |
| Kanban Boards | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sprint Planning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Time Tracking | ✓ | Basic |
| Wiki/Docs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Roadmaps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom Fields | ✓ | ✓ |
| API Access | REST | REST |
| SSO/SAML | ✓ | Enterprise only |
| BIM Support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile App | PWA | PWA |
Winner: tie — It depends on your team. OpenProject for established enterprises that need Gantt, time tracking, and compliance features. Plane for modern software teams that want speed, clean UX, and rapid iteration.
Yes. The community edition is free under GPL-3.0. Enterprise features (SSO, additional security, support) require a paid license starting at $7.25/user/month.
Plane is actively developed and usable for production. It covers issue tracking, sprints, kanban, and roadmaps well. It lacks some enterprise features like Gantt charts and advanced time tracking.
Plane is easier. Its Docker Compose setup is simpler and lighter on resources. OpenProject requires more configuration and RAM but has better documentation for complex deployments.
For software teams using basic Jira features (issues, sprints, boards), yes. Plane has a modern UI and covers core agile workflows. It does not match Jira's full feature set for complex enterprise workflows.