OpenProject vs Taiga head-to-head. Gantt charts, Agile boards, time tracking, self-hosting difficulty, and which project management tool wins for different teams.
OpenProject wins for teams needing Gantt charts, time tracking, and enterprise compliance. Taiga wins for pure Agile/Scrum teams wanting a cleaner UI and faster setup.
| Feature | OpenProject | Taiga |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | GPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | ✓ |
| Docker Deploy | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gantt Charts | ✓ | ✗ |
| Kanban Boards | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scrum Sprints | ✓ | ✓ |
| Backlog Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Time Tracking | ✓ | Basic |
| Wiki/Docs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Epics Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Import from Jira | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSO/SAML | ✓ | Paid only |
| BIM Support | ✓ | ✗ |
Winner: OpenProject — OpenProject wins for the broader feature set: Gantt charts, time tracking, BIM, and enterprise auth. Choose Taiga only if your team is purely Agile/Scrum and does not need Gantt or time tracking.
The community edition is free under GPL-3.0. Enterprise features (SSO, 2FA, custom fields) require a paid license starting at $7.25/user/month.
No. Taiga focuses on Agile/Scrum workflows with Kanban boards, backlogs, and sprints. For Gantt charts, use OpenProject or Plane.
Taiga is better for pure Scrum. Its sprint planning, velocity tracking, and burndown charts are more polished. OpenProject supports Scrum but its UI is less focused.
Both support Jira import. Taiga also imports from Trello, Asana, and GitHub Issues. OpenProject imports from Jira and CSV.