Pi-hole vs AdGuard Home comparison. Two leading DNS-based ad blockers. Setup, features, performance, encryption support, and which to choose for your network.
AdGuard Home is the more modern choice with built-in DoH/DoT encryption and a cleaner UI. Pi-hole has the larger community and more mature ecosystem. Both block ads equally well at the DNS level.
| Feature | Pi-hole | AdGuard Home |
|---|---|---|
| DNS-over-HTTPS | Via addon | ✓ |
| DNS-over-TLS | Via addon | ✓ |
| Per-client Filtering | Via groups | ✓ |
| Blocklist Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Encrypted DNS Upstream | Via config | ✓ |
| Web Interface | ✓ | ✓ |
| API Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Raspberry Pi Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Parental Controls | ✗ | ✓ |
| Query Log Retention | 24h default | Configurable |
Winner: AdGuard Home — AdGuard Home wins for most users with built-in encrypted DNS, per-client filtering, and a modern UI. Pi-hole is the safer choice if you value the larger community and extensive documentation.
No. DNS-level blockers cannot block ads served from the same domain as content (like YouTube, Twitch). Use a browser extension for those.
Not recommended. Pick one — running both creates DNS conflicts and adds unnecessary complexity.
Pi-hole uses less RAM (~30MB vs ~80MB). Both are lightweight enough for a Raspberry Pi.
Yes. Both work with WireGuard, Tailscale, and other VPNs. Configure VPN clients to use the DNS blocker as their DNS server.